WebMar 6, 2024 · For more information about the Thinx Period Underwear class action settlement, write to Dickens et al. v. Thinx Inc. Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box 3689, Portland, OR 97208-3689, call 1-888-501-8492, email [email protected] or visit the Thinx Period Underwear class action settlement website at https ... WebOn May 25, 2024, Nicole Dickens (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, represented by Andrei V. Rado, Erin J. Ruben, Harper T. Segui, and …
Dickens v. Thinx Inc. Settlement - Submit a Claim Page 1
WebMay 25, 2024 · Dickens v. Thinx, Inc. 1:2024cv04286 US District Court for the Southern District of New York Justia. Dickens v. Thinx, Inc. Plaintiff: Nicole Dickens, Haleh … WebMar 8, 2024 · Dickens, et al. v. Thinx Inc. , No. 1:22-cv-4286-JMF Home FAQs Documents Submit a Claim Contact Submit a Claim - Page 1 Contact Information: Contact Information All communications from the Settlement Administrator regarding your claim and potential benefits will be directed to the information as provided below. First Name:* Middle Initial: dutchsinse coffee
Dickens v Thinx, Inc - unicourt.com
WebFeb 27, 2024 · Attorneys representing consumers who sued Thinx Inc. over PFAS in absorbent period underwear seek nearly $1.5 million in fees for their work on a nationwide class settlement that includes a $5 million fund and efforts to keep the harmful chemicals out of the products. Nicole Dickens and others alleged that Thinx deceptively marketed … WebDickens v. Thinx, Inc. Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Letter Motion to Stay re: #17 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Request to Vacate Upcoming Case Deadlines addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Purvi G. Patel dated September 1, 2024. ... New York 10007 Re: Dickens et al. v. Thinx Inc.; Case No. 1:22-cv-04286-JMF Request to … Web(November 30, 2024) - A class action claiming Thinx Inc.'s reusable menstrual products contain toxic "forever chemicals" has ended in a settlement requiring the company to pay $5 million in compensation to customers and ensure the chemicals are not added to underwear. Dickens et al. v. Thinx Inc., in a pentagon all angles are